Algorithms rule
The increasing dominance of algorithms raises important concerns about their effect on creativity and the direction of content development.
As platforms rely more heavily on algorithms to shape what users see, creators face a difficult question: Are they creating for people or for algorithms?
The pressure to optimise content for algorithmic success can shift the focus away from genuine creative expression. Instead of challenging audiences with innovative ideas or fresh perspectives, content is often shaped to satisfy what the algorithm prioritises—engagement, virality, and maximum screen time.
This raises another question: Do algorithms truly serve culture, or do they simply reinforce the familiar and the easy-todigest? In his book Filterworld, Kyle Chayka explores how Big Tech shapes and limits our cultural landscape. He argues that, in response to “algorithmic anxiety” and digital overwhelm, people tend to gravitate towards content that soothes rather than challenges. “Our natural reaction is to seek out culture that embraces nothingness,” Chayka notes, suggesting that powerful, thought-provoking work is increasingly sidelined in favor of content that is comforting, repetitive and safe.
For creators, the impact is profound. To succeed in Filterworld, many adapt their work to fit the mold of what algorithms reward—content that triggers engagement metrics, but often lacks depth.